Did you feel that the doctor's skill is more important than the number of shots with Ultherapy?

I am asking this question because I am curious about those who have actually received Ulthera. While researching clinics, I noticed that even for the same Ulthera, the number of shots varies greatly—such as 300, 400, or 600—and the price differences are quite significant. So, I am wondering if it is right to simply choose a place with the most shots.

For those who have actually received the treatment, did you feel that the practitioner's experience or design was more important than the number of shots? I am also curious if there were differences in results even with the same 300 to 400 shots, depending on which area was treated and at what depth.

I understand that the necessary areas and depths vary depending on facial shape, skin thickness, and fat volume, so I would like to know if it was good to choose a place that thoroughly checked these factors during the consultation. I heard that since Ultherapy allows you to check skin layers while viewing real-time ultrasound images and select depths such as 1.5mm, 3.0mm, and 4.5mm, it is difficult to simply compare numbers.

울쎄라, 어떤 차이가 있을까?

👉 울쎄라 정보 보러가기
hub-link

4.9K people are talking about Ulthera right now

Comments4
  • Profile Image
    지은
    완전요~~ 울쎄라는 고가장비다보니 확실히 강남쪽 등등
    시술경험많으신 분에게 받는게 낫더라구요 ^^
    경력도 무시못하죠 ~~ㅠㅠ
  • Profile Image
    케이스
    울쎄라의 샷 수 자체보다는 그것을 행하는 의료진에게 더 큰 영향력이 있다고 보는게 타당하다고 합니다. 재료도 중요하지만 시술자의 실력인 것이죠. 
  • Profile Image
    행복한일상
    울쎄라는 샷 수 자체보다 원장님의 진단·부위별 에너지 설계·SMAS층 타겟팅 실력이 결과에 더 중요하게 작용해요 
  • Profile Image
    원희
    울쎄라는 샷 수가 많을수록 무조건 좋은 시술은 아니며, 같은 300~600샷이라도 얼굴형·피부 두께·지방량에 맞춰 어느 부위에 몇 샷을 배분하고 1.5mm·3.0mm·4.5mm 중 어떤 깊이를 쓰는지가 결과 차이를 더 크게 만들 수 있어요
    상담할 때는 몇 삿보다 실시간 초음파로 피부층을 확인하는지, 볼패임 위험 부위는 제외하거나 조절하는지, 턱선·이중턱·볼·눈가별 깊이 설계가 있는지를 자세히 확인하는 곳이 좋아요