If the sagging is not severe, which would be better, Volneumer or Thermage?

My facial sagging isn't severe, but when I look in the mirror lately, it feels like my facial contours have dropped slightly compared to before, so I'm looking into getting a facelift.

I noticed my nasolabial folds were more prominent than before, and my deep cheeks seemed to be sagging a bit, so I tried the Bollneumer treatment. Personally, I was satisfied because my nasolabial folds are less visible and my facial contours feel a bit more refined.

So I was thinking about getting a second round of Volneumer, but Thermage keeps catching my eye too.

I am wondering if there is no need to get Thermage from the start unless the sagging is very severe, or if Thermage actually offers higher satisfaction for this level of concern.

If anyone has compared these two procedures when only slightly concerned about nasolabial folds or cheek fat, please share your experience and tell me which one you chose.

볼뉴머, 어떤 차이가 있을까?

👉 볼뉴머 정보 보러가기
hub-link

2.6K people are talking about Thermage right now

hub-link

1.6K people are talking about Volneumer right now

hub-link

17K people are talking about Lifting right now

Comments3
  • Profile Image
    원희
    BEST
    볼뉴머와 써마지는 같은 리프팅 계열이지만 에너지 방식과 시술 목적이 조금 달라요. 
    처짐이 심하지 않더라도 피부 두께나 탄력, 지방량에 따라 적합한 시술이 달라질 수 있어서 무조건 써마지가 더 좋다고 보기는 어렵고 현재 고민에 맞춰 상담받는 게 가장 좋을 것 같아요
  • mhuii
    볼뉴머는 처짐, 얼굴선 정돈을 자연스럽게 할 때 받기 좋고, 써마지는 탄력, 잔주름처럼 전반적인 탄력 개선을 좀 더 중점적으로 볼 때 선택하는 시술이에요. 지금처럼 처짐이 심하지 않고 볼뉴머에서 이미 만족했다면 2차를 먼저 해보고, 탄력이나 잔주름까지 더 효과보고 싶을 때 써마지를 고려해도 괜찮을 것 같아요.