Which procedure looks more natural, Sculptra or Juvelook Volume?

Lately, as I've lost weight in my face, my front and side cheeks look sunken compared to before, so I'm considering getting a procedure. As I get older, I'm really concerned that my face is losing elasticity and volume overall.

At first, I considered fillers, but I hesitated because I was worried they might make my face look too puffy or look obviously fake. Then I learned about Sculptra and Juvelook Volume, and I heard that since both work by inducing collagen production, they can provide natural-looking improvement.

What I'm curious about is the actual difference between the two procedures. I want to know the differences in the degree of facial volume gain and skin elasticity improvement, as well as which one offers more satisfactory results in terms of duration.

In particular, since I don't have much fat on my face and tend to have sunken cheeks, I want an overall soft and natural impression rather than having my face filled out excessively.

쥬베룩, 실제 효과 있을까?

👉 쥬베룩 정보 보러가기
hub-link

20K people are talking about Lifting right now

Comments1
  • 둘 다 자가 콜라겐 생성을 유도해서 자연스러운 볼륨 주는 건 비슷하지만 입자랑 목적에 미세한 차이가 있어요
    개인 얼굴형이나 꺼진 부위 특성에 따라 맞는 시술이 다르니 직접 진료받아보시는 걸 추천해요 ㅎㅎ

Popular in 스컬트라 Talk

See more in 스컬트라 Talk