I want to improve my nasolabial folds, and I'm debating between Sculptra and fillers.

As I get older, I feel like my facial volume is gradually decreasing, and I am particularly concerned because my nasolabial folds are becoming more noticeable.

At first, I thought getting fillers in the nasolabial folds would suffice, but after doing some research, I found out that Sculptra works by inducing collagen production to gradually improve volume and elasticity.

I like that fillers have the advantage of showing results relatively quickly, and that Sculptra produces natural-looking changes. However, it is difficult to make a decision because the most suitable procedure seems to differ depending on whether my nasolabial folds are caused by a lack of volume or sagging cheeks.

For those who have compared the two procedures or received consultations, what differences did you notice? Rather than blindly choosing just one, I would like to select the procedure based on the underlying cause. I would appreciate it if you could also let me know what I absolutely must check during the consultation.

필러, 어떤 차이가 있을까?

👉 필러 정보 보러가기
Comments1
  • Profile Image
    원희
    팔자주름은 볼륨 부족인지 처짐 때문인지에 따라 적합한 시술이 달라질 수 있다고 해요. 
    필러와 스컬트라의 차이뿐 아니라 유지 기간과 부작용, 필요한 시술 횟수까지 비교해 보고 결정하면 좋겠어요. 
    상담할 때 주름이 생긴 원인을 먼저 확인하는 게 중요해요

Popular in 스컬트라 Talk

See more in 스컬트라 Talk