์ฃผ์ฌ๊น์ง๋ ์ธ์ ใ ใ ์นผ ๋๋ ์๊ฐ ์์ฐ์ ์๋์ง
To what extent can a procedure be considered natural beauty?
No, these days I see kids called natural beauties.
More than half are procedure-related.
How far do you have to go to be called a natural beauty? ๐ค
My thoughts are like this, yes yes.
ย
This is really a natural beauty.
ย
- Dermatology treatments (toning, Rejuran, water glow, etc.) โ Just recognized as treatments that make the skin look good
- Deep double eyelids or extremely thin incisions โ Pass if you think it was always like that
- Small amount of co- filler โ Seems a bit higher, but if you're wondering if it was always like that, pass.
- Orthodontics โ Orthodontics is recognized as natural beauty.
ย
It's a bit awkward at this point.
- Upper eyelid fold surgery, lower eyelid fold surgery โ When the eyes look bigger, even monolids feel different lol
Semi-permanent eyebrows, hairline โ completely changes the atmosphere, isn't this just a procedure?
- Natural-looking nose surgery โ Well, if it doesn't look completely obvious... but in the end, they still cut with a knife.
ย
This isn't a natural beauty lololol
- Distinct double eyelids โ If someone suddenly has them when they didn't before, it just stands out.
- Cheekbone and jawline reduction โ You know your face shape changes completely, and you're not naturally beautiful, right?
- Corner of the mouth surgery, chin filler overload โ if the corners of the mouth are raised and the chin is super pointed, it just looks obvious lol
ย
Ultimately, if the procedure is done moderately, it looks like a "naturally beautiful person."
Isn't it just a little more and you'll be "surgery ready"?
No, but these days, getting double eyelid surgery is just considered part of routine care.
So, what is the standard for being a natural beauty? LOL