Newly released Cheongna apartment electric vehicle fire black box footage

 

 

Even experts initially thought that the flames kept spreading to one car at a time in the neighboring lane.

 

The fire quickly spread to the ceiling piping structure due to the sprinkler not functioning properly.

 

A disaster-level fire occurred as falling debris poured from the sky, simultaneously burning all vehicles in the underground parking lot.

 

1. Primary cause: Fire occurred in an electric vehicle.
2.  
3. Primary cause 2-1: The sprinkler did not operate, leading to the spread of the fire.
4.  

Secondary cause 2: A significant amount of flammable materials were placed at the top of the parking lot, accelerating the spread of the fire.

 

Result: Vehicle XX destroyed completely

 

Even if the primary cause here changes to an internal combustion engine vehicle, the outcome is unlikely to change.

 

In other words, ignoring and dismissing everything as the primary cause is like turning a blind eye.

 

Is it correct to only address the causes with the greatest validity that prevent results, and ignore those with lesser effects, thereby leading to division, inciting hatred, and manipulating public opinion?

 

I don't think it's me.